FREE standard shipping & FREE returns
HIPS: With your feet together, measure around the fullest part of your hips to ensure you’ll have enough room to move comfortably.
TALL: All tall sizes are 5 cm longer than regular sizes and are marked with a T behind the size
SHORT: All short sizes are 5 cm shorter than regular sizes and are marked with a S behind the size
Ultra-tight, second-skin fit that keeps you locked in.
A slimmer, athletic cut that allows total mobility but eliminates the bulk of extra fabric.
Fuller cut for complete comfort, total range of motion & greater breathability.
You must be logged in to share by email.
Size and length are typical of most UA shorts. Waistband fits great and they are super comfy. [This review was collected as part of a promotion.]
These were OK but not very comfortable for athletic activity. Road up and didn't keep stuff in place. [This review was collected as part of a promotion.]
THIS IS THE ONLY NEGATIVE REVIEW I HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT ANY UNDER ARMOUR PRODUCT. BASICALLY MOST EVERYTHING I WEAR IS UNDER ARMOUR EXCEPT SHOES JUST CAN'T GET THE FIT RIGHT FOR ME ON SHOES.
THIS PRODUCT ALTHOUGH IT FEELS REALLY GOOD TO WEAR WILL NOT STAY UP ON YOUR BACKSIDE, YOU WILL BE CONSTANTLY PULLING THEM UP. I BOUGHT 7 PAIRS AND WISH THERE WAS SOMEWAY TO RECOVER MY LOSS BECAUSE THEY ARE EXPENSIVE.GENERALLY I PAY MORE FOR UNDER ARMOUR PRODUCTS BECAUSE YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR ,BUT NOT IN THIS CASE.
JUST KNOW AFTER FOLLOWING ALL WASH AND DRY INSTRUCTIONS THEY FAIL TO STAY UP. I WISH I HAD KNOWN THIS BEFORE PURCHASE. HOPE THIS HELPS FUTURE CUSTOMERS OF THIS PRODUCT TO MAKE A DECISION BEFORE BUYING. [This review was collected as part of a promotion.]
Best boxers I’ve bought. Need to get a few more pairs [This review was collected as part of a promotion.]
Really liked these when I first purchased them. Unfortunately, the waist area is no longer providing support so they constantly fall down. I can’t wear them anymore.
I work out 6 out of 7 days a week and I have bought the Original Boxerjock before and wanted to try these out. I liked the feel and length, but when putting them on, the pouch area has no support. I know there's no fly, but that doesn't bother me. With the Original Boxerjock, I have always had support, these however do not. Otherwise, I think they'll work.
Despite costing $5 more than Original Series BoxerJocks and appearing more luxe at first glance, these really aren't an improvement.
Waistband- The material of the underwear is hot pressed/ glued over top of the waistband, giving a neat modern, seamless appearance from the outside but placing the waistband up against the skin.
Support- Despite being no-fly, the pouch is not as supportive as other mesh underwear and really not quite as supportive as Original Series BoxerJocks.
Material- This is a very thin, stretchy, nylon-like material which is nearly see-through when stretched. Not obscene, but definitely a bit out of my comfort zone. It doesn't even feel as breathable as previous mesh materials. I don't like it.
All-in-all, these are an OK substitution for standard BoxerJocks, but not as good as M Series, Mesh Series or UA Tech Mesh. I see no reason to pay more for something of lesser comfort level.